Bitfinex - Features - Bitcoin Trading

3commas crypto trading bot review 2020-The best crypto trading bot

3commas crypto trading bot review 2020-The best crypto trading bot
3commas crypto trading bot review 2020 is detailed and comprehensive review of 3commas trading bot, covering all its features and important topics

3commas crypto trading bot review 2020
LETS BEGIN
3Commas crypto trading bot provides access to a variety of trading tools to crypto trader to improve their crypto trading strategy. When used properly, these tools can maximize crypto trader profits and reduce your risk of loss.
3Commas crypto trading bot is best known for its trading bots. In this 3Commas review, we examine the features that make this platform so powerful.

Crypto trading bot

Crypto trading bot have received a lot of attention lately due to advances in their algorithm and growing success rate.
Nobody can watch the market around the clock, and the volatility of the crypto space makes it possible to take losses or miss opportunities in seconds.
Fortunately, a well-programmed crypto trading bot can take over the control while you sleep, eat, or do other activities
As a 3Commas user, you can copy the trading of other bots on 3 commas, automating trade orders, and track top portfolios.
With these handy protocols, you can pre-program your trading strategy based on loss and profit percentages, price points or a variety of other market conditions.
The 3Commas crypto trading bot has over 33,000 registered users with a daily trading volume of around $ 10 million.

3Commas pricing

The below image shows the 3Commas pricing in detail

3commas pricing

3Commas crypto trading bot feature

  • Automated trading around the clock: The main feature of 3Commas crypto trading bot is that you can automatically trade 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • 23 supported exchanges: 3Commas supports 23 major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Binance, Bittrex, Coinbase Pro, BitMEX, Bitfinex, Poloniex, Bitstamp, Bybit, Cex, Kraken, KuCoin, OKex, Huobi, Exmo, Gate.io, HitBTC and YoBit (also) Binance DEX, Binance Jersey, Binance US).
  • Simultaneous Profit Taking and Stop Loss: Adjust trades with profit or stop loss commands to secure profits or minimize losses.
  • Trailing Take Profit and Stop Loss: Customize Stop Loss and commands with Trailing Take Profit and Stop Loss so that the limits automatically increase when a coin rises in price.
  • Sell ​​by multiple targets: You can Sell your coins by multiple targets.
  • TradingView signals and charts: With 3Commas you can display simultaneous exchange rate charts and TradingView signals in a single window.
  • Paper trading: 3Commas has a paper trading feature that allows you to fully test the platform's trading features before actual purchasing.
  • Simple and compound bots: 3Commas offers simple bots with which you can execute a trade pair and compound bots with which you can execute several trade pairs
  • Long algorithms and Short algorithms: 3Commas trading bot can use long or short algorithms. Using long algorithms, the bot buys a coin with the settings you have created and then lists orders for sale at a higher price. With 3Commas you can implement short algorithms. The bot sells a coin after you create settings and then places a purchase order at a lower price
  • Analyze and copy bots: 3Commas crypto trading bot can analyze performance and then view and copy other bot settings via 3Commas
  • Create and customize portfolios: With 3Commas you can create portfolios with any number of coins.

How to use 3commas crypto trading bot

Get started with 3Commas
Creating an account is a straightforward process. On the main page, at the top of the page, is the green "Create Account" tab.

  • Create an account
Visit the 3Commas trading bot website and enter an email address and password to register.
After confirming your account by clicking the link in the email you sent, you will have access to the dashboard.

https://preview.redd.it/wbnl0whxcfi41.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=37d2a6867ecdcc46351e5acf7db4747182d422c7
Sign up here

  • Choose the bot type
There are four types of trading bots: short, simple, composite and composite short bots. A simple 3 commas trading bot can trade only in one pair, while composite bot can trade on multiple pairs

  • Connect an Cryptocurrency Exchange:
Use your API key to connect your crypto exchange with 3commas
3commas crypto trading bot have different features for different crypto exchnage, see detail in image below

3commas bot review 2020

  • Choose a trading pair and set the base trading size
You can select the trading pair you want your crypto trading bot to trade from the drop-down menu, and then tell your crypto trading bot how much of your preferred currency you will use during your first trade

https://preview.redd.it/v14b6qdpdfi41.png?width=737&format=png&auto=webp&s=a53ae697a779597a4b2ab69412e39c3d8e5ef92a

  • Set target profit
Before you do this, you should set a safety size because you can do more controlled purchases after a dive. If a trading pair is selected by ETH / BTC and the price after the purchase of ETH falls below the original purchase price, you can use security transactions to buy more ETH with the BTC amount specified in the size of the security trade.

3commas crypto trading bot review
You can then set the target profit, which informs the crypto trading bot, in percentages, when to sell. If a target profit is set at 3%, the crypto trading bot will automatically execute a sell order as soon as this profit is realized

  • Select the type of profit taking
There are two take profit options that represent a percentage from base trading or a percentage from total volume

  • Set the maximum number of security transactions
This informs the 3commas crypto trading bota of how many security transactions it can perform before stopping, and the maximum number of active security transactions tells the merchant bot the number of active security transactions it can perform at any given time

https://preview.redd.it/0gye86zfffi41.png?width=739&format=png&auto=webp&s=37481a91f4006d2ca54e6bb5f47605452e50cd8e

  • Set the price variance to open security deals
This tells the 3commas crypto trading bot when to start executing security transactions and is set as a percentage. If set to 3, if the price of the selected currency falls 3% below the original trading price, the trading bot will start executing security transactions.

  • Set the trading start conditions
This informs the bot when the first trade should be completed and there is a choice between TradingView Signal Buy or Strong Buy, TradingView Signal Strong Buy, Manual or Open New Trade ASAP.

https://preview.redd.it/60xcqvusdfi41.png?width=730&format=png&auto=webp&s=97be8152c9129dc0260cca9d262986d0a502d3b5
If you follow these steps, a 3commas crypto trading bot can be configured in just a few minutes and the whole process is so simple that more beginners can successfully follow. The platform is still detailed enough to attract experienced traders as well.

How safe is 3Commas?

It should be noted that you actually do not have any money on the 3commas and your trading bots cannot withdraw from your linkedaccounts.
Like other trading bots, your 3commas crypto trading bot connect to your Exchange accounts via the API and then carryon automated trading on the exchanges you linked
These keys provide trading bots with limited access to user accounts to conduct trades only and do not grant bots any withdrawal rights.
This also means that if your account is compromised and nefarious actors could take control of your trading activities, they still cannot access your exchange accounts directly to make withdrawals.

Is 3Commas for beginners?

The platform is generally fairly easy to navigate even for new cryptocurrency trader, and the trading bots are easy to set up.
Various functions are easily accessible from your account. You can connect to an exchange at the push of a button and set up intelligent trades and bots.
The dashboard is also clear and users can quickly select their preferred tabs and functions from the side window.
In addition, features such as bot analysis, which lists the best performing bots and trading pairs as well as the market, are well executed and easy to understand. While the portfolio creation, tracking and social trading features are suitable for both new and experienced traders.

Conclusion

Most Crypto trading bot are difficult to use. However, 3Commas has created a trading bot that is easy to set up, customize, and easy to use.
It is also reliable compared to its lower quality competitors and is one of the best crypto trading bot
3Commas is considered the most reputable trading bot
The 3commas is completely transparent in terms of operation and location, and we know exactly who is running the company. We also appreciate 3Commas customer service, which is available 24/7 through several contact methods.
As mentioned above, there are inherent risks when trading cryptoassets. However, since many expect Bitcoin price to rise in the next few years due to halving under other driving factors it may make sense to start with a proven trading system like 3commas to see if You can earn more Bitcoin and see how the value increases in the future.
With features like portfolio creation and tracking, bot customization, best compatibility with cryptocurrency exchange and much more, 3Commas is one of the best trading bot platforms available today.
ViSIT 3commas Crypto Trading Bot
submitted by jakkkmotivator to thecryptobasic [link] [comments]

batching in Bitcoin

On May 6th, 2017, Bitcoin hit an all-time high in transactions processed on the network in a single day: it moved 375,000 transactions which accounted for a nominal output of about $2.5b. Average fees on the Bitcoin network had climbed over a dollar for the first time a couple days prior. And they kept climbing: by early June average fees hit an eye-watering $5.66. This was quite unprecedented. In the three-year period from Jan. 1 2014 to Jan. 1 2017, per-transaction fees had never exceeded 31 cents on a weekly average. And the hits kept coming. Before 2017 was over, average fees would top out at $48 on a weekly basis. When the crypto-recession set in, transaction count collapsed and fees crept back below $1.
During the most feverish days of the Bitcoin run-up, when normal users found themselves with balances that would cost more to send than they were worth, cries for batching — the aggregation of many outputs into a single transaction — grew louder than ever. David Harding had written a blog post on the cost-savings of batching at the end of August and it was reposted to the Bitcoin subreddit on a daily basis.
The idea was simple: for entities sending many transactions at once, clustering outputs into a single transaction was more space- (and cost-) efficient, because each transaction has a fixed data overhead. David found that if you combined 10 payments into one transaction, rather than sending them individually, you could save 75% of the block space. Essentially, batching is one way to pack as many transactions as possible into the finite block space available on Bitcoin.
When fees started climbing in mid-2017, users began to scrutinize the behavior of heavy users of the Bitcoin blockchain, to determine whether they were using block space efficiently. By and large, they were not — and an informal lobbying campaign began, in which these major users — principally exchanges — were asked to start batching transactions and be good stewards of the scarce block space at their disposal. Some exchanges had been batching for years, others relented and implemented it. The question faded from view after Bitcoin’s price collapsed in Q1 2018 from roughly $19,000 to $6000, and transaction load — and hence average fee — dropped off.
But we remained curious. A common refrain, during the collapse in on-chain usage, was that transaction count was an obfuscated method of apprehending actual usage. The idea was that transactions could encode an arbitrarily large (within reason) number of payments, and so if batching had become more and more prevalent, those payments were still occurring, just under a regime of fewer transactions.

“hmmm”
Some sites popped up to report outputs and payments per day rather than transactions, seemingly bristling at the coverage of declining transaction count. However, no one conducted an analysis of the changing relationship between transaction count and outputs or payments. We took it upon ourselves to find out.
Table Of Contents:
Introduction to batching
A timeline
Analysis
Conclusion
Bonus content: UTXO consolidation
  1. Introduction to batching
Bitcoin uses a UTXO model, which stands for Unspent Transaction Output. In comparison, Ripple and Ethereum use an account/balance model. In bitcoin, a user has no balances, only UTXOs that they control. If they want to transfer money to someone else, their wallet selects one or more UTXOs as inputs that in sum need to add up to the amount they want to transfer. The desired amount then goes to the recipient, which is called the output, and the difference goes back to the sender, which is called change output. Each output can carry a virtually unlimited amount of value in the form of satoshis. A satoshi is a unit representing a one-hundred-millionth of a Bitcoin. This is very similar to a physical wallet full of different denominations of bills. If you’re buying a snack for $2.50 and only have a $5, you don’t hand the cashier half of your 5 dollar bill — you give him the 5 and receive some change instead.
Unknown to some, there is no hardcoded limit to the number of transactions that can fit in a block. Instead, each transaction has a certain size in megabytes and constitutes an economic incentive for miners to include it in their block. Because miners have limited space of 2 MB to sell to transactors, larger transactions (in size, not bitcoin!) will need to pay higher fees to be included. Additionally, each transaction can have a virtually unlimited number of inputs or outputs — the record stands at transactions with 20,000 inputs and 13,107 outputs.
So each transaction has at least one input and at one output, but often more, as well as some additional boilerplate stuff. Most of that space is taken up by the input (often 60% or more, because of the signature that proves they really belong to the sender), while the output(s) account for 15–30%. In order to keep transactions as small as possible and save fees, Bitcoin users have two major choices:
Use as few inputs as possible. In order to minimize inputs, you can periodically send your smaller UTXOs to yourself in times when fees are very low, getting one large UTXO back. That is called UTXO consolidation or consolidating your inputs.
Users who frequently make transfers (especially within the same block) can include an almost unlimited amount of outputs (to different people!) in the same transaction. That is called transaction batching. A typical single output transaction takes up 230 bytes, while a two output transaction only takes up 260 bytes, instead of 460 if you were to send them individually.
This is something that many casual commentators overlook when comparing Bitcoin with other payment systems — a Bitcoin transaction can aggregate thousands of individual economic transfers! It’s important to recognize this, as it is the source of a great deal of misunderstanding and mistaken analysis.
We’ve never encountered a common definition of a batched transaction — so for the purposes of this study we define it in the loosest possible sense: a transaction with three or more outputs. Commonly, batching is understood as an activity undertaken primarily by mining pools or exchanges who can trade off immediacy for efficiency. It is rare that a normal bitcoin user would have cause to batch, and indeed most wallets make it difficult to impossible to construct batched transactions. For everyday purposes, normal bitcoiners will likely not go to the additional effort of batching transactions.
We set the threshold at three for simplicity’s sake — a normal unbatched transaction will have one transactional output and one change output — but the typical major batched transaction from an exchange will have dozens if not hundreds of outputs. For this reason we are careful to provide data on various different batch sizes, so we could determine the prevalence of three-output transactions and colossal, 100-output ones.
We find it helpful to think of a Bitcoin transaction as a mail truck full of boxes. Each truck (transaction) contains boxes (outputs), each of contains some number of letters (satoshis). So when you’re looking at transaction count as a measure of the performance and economic throughput of the Bitcoin network, it’s a bit like counting mail trucks to discern how many letters are being sent on a given day, even though the number of letters can vary wildly. The truck analogy also makes it clear why many see Bitcoin as a settlement layer in the future — just as mail trucks aren’t dispatched until they’re full, some envision that the same will ultimately be the case for Bitcoin.

Batching
  1. A timeline
So what actually happened in the last six months? Let’s look at some data. Daily transactions on the Bitcoin network rose steadily until about May 2017, when average fees hit about $4. This precipitated the first collapse in usage. Then began a series of feedback loops over the next six months in which transaction load grew, fees grew to match, and transactions dropped off. This cycle repeated itself five times over the latter half of 2017.

more like this on coinmetrics.io
The solid red line in the above chart is fees in BTC terms (not USD) and the shaded red area is daily transaction count. You can see the cycle of transaction load precipitating higher fees which in turn cause a reduction in usage. It repeats itself five or six times before the detente in spring 2018. The most notable period was the December-January fee crisis, but fees were actually fairly typical in BTC terms — the rising BTC price in USD however meant that USD fees hit extreme figures.
In mid-November when fees hit double digits in USD terms, users began a concerted campaign to convince exchanges to be better stewards of block space. Both Segwit and batching were held up as meaningful approaches to maximize the compression of Bitcoin transactions into the finite block space available. Data on when exchanges began batching is sparse, but we collected information where it was available into a chart summarizing when exchanges began batching.

Batching adoption at selected exchanges
We’re ignoring Segwit adoption by exchanges in this analysis; as far as batching is concerned, the campaign to get exchanges to batch appears to have persuaded Bitfinex, Binance, and Shapeshift to batch. Coinbase/GDAX have stated their intention to begin batching, although they haven’t managed to integrate it yet. As far as we can tell, Gemini hasn’t mentioned batching, although we have some mixed evidence that they may have begun recently. If you know about the status of batching on Gemini or other major exchanges please get in touch.
So some exchanges have been batching all along, and some have never bothered at all. Did the subset of exchanges who flipped the switch materially affect the prevalence of batched transactions? Let’s find out.
  1. Analysis
3.1 How common is batching?
We measured the prevalence of batching in three different ways, by transaction count, by output value and by output count.

The tl;dr.
Batching accounts for roughly 12% of all transactions, 40% of all outputs, and 30–60% of all raw BTC output value. Not bad.
3.2 Have batched transactions become more common over time?
From the chart in 3.1, we can already see a small, but steady uptrend in all three metrics, but we want to dig a little deeper. So we first looked at the relationship of payments (all outputs that actually pay someone, so total outputs minus change outputs) and transactions.

More at transactionfee.info/charts
The first thing that becomes obvious is that the popular narrative — that the drop in transactions was caused by an increase in batching — is not the case; payments dropped by roughly the same proportion as well.
Dividing payment count by transaction count gives us some insight into the relationship between the two.

In our analysis we want to zoom into the time frame between November 2017 and today, and we can see that payments per transactions have actually been rallying, from 1.5 payments per transaction in early 2017 to almost two today.
3.3 What are popular batch sizes?
In this next part, we will look at batch sizes to see which are most popular. To determine which transactions were batched, we downloaded a dataset of all transactions on the Bitcoin network between November 2017 and May 2018from Blockchair.
We picked that period because the fee crisis really got started in mid-November, and with it, the demands for exchanges to batch. So we wanted to capture the effect of exchanges starting to batch. Naturally a bigger sample would have been more instructive, but we were constrained in our resources, so we began with the six month sample.
We grouped transactions into “batched” and “unbatched” groups with batched transactions being those with three or more outputs.

We then divided batched transactions into roughly equal groups on the basis of how much total output in BTC they had accounted for in the six-month period. We didn’t select the batch sizes manually — we picked batch sizes that would split the sample into equal parts on the basis of transaction value. Here’s what we ended up with:

All of the batch buckets have just about the same fraction of total BTC output over the period, but they account for radically different transaction and output counts over the period. Notice that there were only 183,108 “extra large” batches (with 41 or more outputs) in the six-month period, but between them there were 23m outputs and 30m BTC worth of value transmitted.
Note that output value in this context refers to the raw or unadjusted figure — it would have been prohibitively difficult for us to adjust output for change or mixers, so we’re using the “naive” estimate.
Let’s look at how many transactions various batch sizes accounted for in the sample period:


Batched transactions steadily increased relative to unbatched ones, although the biggest fraction is the small batch with between 3 and 5 outputs. The story for output counts is a bit more illuminating. Even though batched transactions are a relatively small fraction of overall transaction count, they contain a meaningful number of overall outputs. Let’s see how it breaks down:


Lastly, let’s look at output value. Here we see that batched transactions represent a significant fraction of value transmitted on Bitcoin.


As we can see, even though batched transactions make up an average of only 12% of all transactions, they move between 30%-60% of all Bitcoins, at peak times even 70%. We think this is quite remarkable. Keep in mind, however that the ‘total output’ figure has not been altered to account for change outputs, mixers, or self-churn; that is, it is the raw and unadjusted figure. The total output value is therefore not an ideal approximation of economic volume on the Bitcoin network.
3.4 Has transaction count become an unreliable measure of Bitcoin’s usage because of batching?
Yes. We strongly encourage any analysts, investors, journalists, and developers to look past mere transaction count from now on. The default measure of Bitcoin’s performance should be “payments per day” rather than transaction count. This also makes Bitcoin more comparable with other UTXO chains. They generally have significantly variable payments-per-transaction ratios, so just using payments standardizes that. (Stay tuned: Coinmetrics will be rolling out tools to facilitate this very soon.)
More generally, we think that the economic value transmitted on the network is its most fundamental characteristic. Both the naive and the adjusted figures deserve to be considered. Adjusting raw output value is still more art than science, and best practices are still being developed. Again, Coinmetrics is actively developing open-source tools to make these adjustments available.
  1. Conclusion
We started by revisiting the past year in Bitcoin and showed that while the mempool was congested, the community started looking for ways to use the blockspace more efficiently. Attention quickly fell on batching, the practice of combining multiple outputs into a single transaction, for heavy users. We showed how batching works on a technical level and when different exchanges started implementing the technique.
Today, around 12% of all transactions on the Bitcoin network are batched, and these account for about 40% of all outputs and between 30–60% of all transactional value. The fact such that a small set of transactions carries so much economic weight makes us hopeful that Bitcoin still has a lot of room to scale on the base layer, especially if usage trends continue.
Lastly, it’s worth noting that the increase in batching on the Bitcoin network may not be entirely due to deliberate action by exchanges, but rather a function of its recessionary behavior in the last few months. Since batching is generally done by large industrial players like exchanges, mixers, payment processors, and mining pools, and unbatched transactions are generally made by normal individuals, the batched/unbatched ratio is also a strong proxy for how much average users are using Bitcoin. Since the collapse in price, it is quite possible that individual usage of Bitcoin decreased while “industrial” usage remained strong. This is speculation, but one explanation for what happened.
Alternatively, the industrial players appear to be taking their role as stewards of the scarce block space more seriously. This is a significant boon to the network, and a nontrivial development in its history. If a culture of parsimony can be encouraged, Bitcoin will be able to compress more data into its block space and everyday users will continue to be able to run nodes for the foreseeable future. We view this as a very positive development. Members of the Bitcoin community that lobbied exchanges to add support for Segwit and batching should be proud of themselves.
  1. Bonus content: UTXO consolidation
Remember that we said that a second way to systematically save transaction fees in the Bitcoin network was to consolidate your UTXOs when fees were low? Looking at the relationship between input count and output count allows us to spot such consolidation phases quite well.

Typically, inputs and outputs move together. When the network is stressed, they decouple. If you look at the above chart carefully, you’ll notice that when transactions are elevated (and block space is at a premium), outputs outpace inputs — look at the gaps in May and December 2017. However, prolonged activity always results in fragmented UTXO sets and wallets full of dust, which need to be consolidated. For this, users often wait until pressure on the network has decreased and fees are lower. Thus, after transactions decrease, inputs become more common than outputs. You can see this clearly in February/March 2017.

Here we’ve taken the ratio of inputs to outputs (which have been smoothed on a trailing 7 day basis). When the ratio is higher, there are more inputs than outputs on that day, and vice versa. You can clearly see the spam attack in summer 2015 in which thousands (possibly millions) of outputs were created and then consolidated. Once the ratio spikes upwards, that’s consolidation. The spike in February 2018 after the six weeks of high fees in December 2017 was the most pronounced sigh of relief in Bitcoin’s history; the largest ever departure from the in/out ratio norm. There were a huge number of UTXOs to be consolidated.
It’s also interesting to note where inputs and outputs cluster. Here we have histograms of transactions with large numbers of inputs or outputs. Unsurprisingly, round numbers are common which shows that exchanges don’t publish a transaction every, say, two minutes, but instead wait for 100 or 200 outputs to queue up and then publish their transaction. Curiously, 200-input transactions were more popular than 100-input transactions in the period.


We ran into more curiosities when researching this piece, but we’ll leave those for another time.
Future work on batching might focus on:
Determining batched transactions as a portion of (adjusted) economic rather than raw volume
Looking at the behavior of specific exchanges with regards to batching
Investigating how much space and fees could be saved if major exchanges were batching transactions
Lastly, we encourage everyone to run their transactions through the service at transactionfee.info to assess the efficiency of their transactions and determine whether exchanges are being good stewards of the block space.
Update 31.05.2018
Antoine Le Calvez has created a series of live-updated charts to track batching and batch sizes, which you can find here.
We’d like to thank 0xB10C for their generous assistance with datasets and advice, the people at Blockchair for providing the core datasets, and David A. Harding for writing the initial piece and answering our questions.
submitted by miguelfranco1412 to 800cc [link] [comments]

Is there a trading platform like MT4 that can be used with Bitfinex for Margin Trading?

As the title reads, does anyone know if there is a trading platform similar to MT4 that can be used with Bitfinex for Margin Trading Leverage options?
submitted by rainbowgoblin to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

AMA about Tether (USDT)

Hello, I trade on 6 different exchanges worldwide. I have deeply looked into the Tether situation since it could become a black swan and put a dent into my crypto wealth.
I have examined all the evidence and opinions and have found them to be unsubstantiated at best malicious at worse.
Ask me anything and I will do my best to give you my opinion on what I have found.
 
My only concerns has evolved into... is the idea of Tethers legal (compared to Liberty Reserve or E-gold). After much research on both companies and thinking it over a lot I feel USDT is actually more legit and better suited because of the openness of the blockchain. I know right??
You see they can control the ecosystem (as they did w hack) in a transparent way and they can control the outflows/inflows with stringent KYC/AML (which they have been- far more stories of people not getting approved than not being able to redeem). Their ToS/KYC/AML make it so no launderer would be foolish enough to use them, especially after hack/roll back.
On the other hand, Lib Res/Egold accepted anyone, proudly claimed to be a money substitute and their closed system provided no transparency and plenty of opportunity for nefarious activities.
 
Some key points
 
NOT more transactions taking place (across all blockchains), NOT more countries buying that didn't before (KRW/JPY), NOT Coinbase user accounts being created at an extraordinary clip this year, or the google search terms increasing exponentially, or crypto twitters growth. All differing metrics pointing to the same thing... demand. No it's easier to believe the volume is fake, wash trading, and fake tethers... all out in the open (BFX DATA) & open ledgers (USDT)
 
"But they have been saying an audit is forthcoming" They didn't increase the total amount to 100 mill till fairly recent. They are not a money making machine, they make money on money sitting in interest-bearing accts and transaction fees between the fiat world. I can see them not wanting to pay for an expensive reputable audit and thinking showing bank statements would suffice, until it didn't. So now an audit is coming.
 
 
Ex2. The amount of tethers to date is enough to horribly crash the markets but not enough to show signs that free money has been pumped into the system. If 100's of millions are pumped into the system it will show divergences (premiums/unpegged) somewhere along the trail.
 
One last thing, what if the worse is true and Tether is not backed, finex is a scam, God doesn't exist, and Trump gets elected a second term (last 2 a joke, obviously)? IMO, it creates a massive buying opportunity. There is nothing wrong with bitcoin/crypto, nothing wrong with its use case, technology or value system. Just an alt currency that only had to have the funds in account. Yes, there will be a short game of hot potato that drives Tether to zero, but that is it. Nothing fundamentally wrong w crypto. Plus I'm not 100% sure the exiting of USDT would not drive crypto higher.
Yes, some exchanges will lose their rep, customers, and traders will lose their stablecoin but perhaps that's the goal, IDK? Who benefits from failed stablecoin? FIAT, banks? One thing is for sure USDT has brought on many more exchanges, IMO is a good thing.
Also, I don't believe Tether to be the ideal way to a stablecoin. But it came along 3 years ago w no better options, has held it's pegged (even now under fire), opened up liquidity past strict/biased/predatory banking infrastructure (who benefits if USDT goes down again?). Maybe that is why they are looking into an ERC20 token that may be verified in real-time, IDK.
 
Good day to you Ladies and Gents..
 
P.S. I post my real trades on twitter @SirLamboMoon - Follow to see if I am worth a damn. I don't share charts and analyze what happenED and be as cryptic as possible about the future. I actually put my entries, targets, and stops. I developed a trading system that has been muy caliente. More info here.. https://www.reddit.com/useSirLamboMoon/comments/7cp2o7/the_system_strategy/
submitted by SirLamboMoon to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

AMA about Tether (USDT)

Hello, I trade on 6 different exchanges worldwide. I have deeply looked into the Tether situation since it could become a black swan and put a dent into my crypto wealth.
I have examined all the evidence and opinions and have found them to be unsubstantiated at best malicious at worse.
Ask me anything and I will do my best to give you my opinion on what I have found.
 
My only concerns has evolved into... is the idea of Tethers legal (compared to Liberty Reserve or E-gold). After much research on both companies and thinking it over a lot I feel USDT is actually more legit and better suited because of the openness of the blockchain. I know right??
You see they can control the ecosystem (as they did w hack) in a transparent way and they can control the outflows/inflows with stringent KYC/AML (which they have been- far more stories of people not getting approved than not being able to redeem). Their ToS/KYC/AML make it so no launderer would be foolish enough to use them, especially after hack/roll back.
On the other hand, Lib Res/Egold accepted anyone, proudly claimed to be a money substitute and their closed system provided no transparency and plenty of opportunity for nefarious activities.
 
Some key points
 
NOT more transactions taking place (across all blockchains), NOT more countries buying that didn't before (KRW/JPY), NOT Coinbase user accounts being created at an extraordinary clip this year, or the google search terms increasing exponentially, or crypto twitters growth. All differing metrics pointing to the same thing... demand. No it's easier to believe the volume is fake, wash trading, and fake tethers... all out in the open (BFX DATA) & open ledgers (USDT)
 
"But they have been saying an audit is forthcoming" They didn't increase the total amount to 100 mill till fairly recent. They are not a money making machine, they make money on money sitting in interest-bearing accts and transaction fees between the fiat world. I can see them not wanting to pay for an expensive reputable audit and thinking showing bank statements would suffice, until it didn't. So now an audit is coming.
 
 
Ex2. The amount of tethers to date is enough to horribly crash the markets but not enough to show signs that free money has been pumped into the system. If 100's of millions are pumped into the system it will show divergences (premiums/unpegged) somewhere along the trail.
 
One last thing, what if the worse is true and Tether is not backed, finex is a scam, God doesn't exist, and Trump gets elected a second term (last 2 a joke, obviously)? IMO, it creates a massive buying opportunity. There is nothing wrong with bitcoin/crypto, nothing wrong with its use case, technology or value system. Just an alt currency that only had to have the funds in account. Yes, there will be a short game of hot potato that drives Tether to zero, but that is it. Nothing fundamentally wrong w crypto. Plus I'm not 100% sure the exiting of USDT would not drive crypto higher.
Yes, some exchanges will lose their rep, customers, and traders will lose their stablecoin but perhaps that's the goal, IDK? Who benefits from failed stablecoin? FIAT, banks? One thing is for sure USDT has brought on many more exchanges, IMO is a good thing.
Also, I don't believe Tether to be the ideal way to a stablecoin. But it came along 3 years ago w no better options, has held it's pegged (even now under fire), opened up liquidity past strict/biased/predatory banking infrastructure (who benefits if USDT goes down again?). Maybe that is why they are looking into an ERC20 token that may be verified in real-time, IDK.
 
Good day to you Ladies and Gents..
 
P.S. I post my real trades on twitter @SirLamboMoon - Follow to see if I am worth a damn. I don't share charts and analyze what happenED and be as cryptic as possible about the future. I actually put my entries, targets, and stops. I developed a trading system that has been muy caliente. More info here.. https://www.reddit.com/useSirLamboMoon/comments/7cp2o7/the_system_strategy/
 
EDIT: was told to put an address for the headache I'm about to receive, lol. 1GTtVVfECQvecTtqUoWhXi7pYuWz5KzzTm
submitted by SirLamboMoon to btc [link] [comments]

Another day in a standstill market!! Bitcoin Analysis 12th February

Another day in a standstill market – the last 24 hours were no different from the last few weeks. The price continued to bore traders with sideways action, while forming a congestion pattern.
In a way, congestion comes as good news for those who want to see volatility. At this point, it is clear the bitcoin price is unattractive to most traders. In order to offset their positions, they will either have to pay a high premium or sell their BTC at a lower value. The game thus belongs to those who have major holdings, who will be able to move the market towards any position they like. A little volatility will see every small trader back in the game again.
February 12th Bitcoin Trading Session
As stated above, the BTC/USD continued to move sideways during the February 12th trading session. The pair started the day at around 219 and continued to trail along with little buying volume from order books. The price took baby steps upwards though failed to create volatility due to lack of trade volume.
At press time, the BTC/USD is valued around 221 on Bitfinex.
What to Expect Today? The technical indicators, for the ninth time this week, are indicating a near-term bull attempt. Some short green candles have begun to appear in the last few hours. These upward movements are at least changing the near-term landscape in this overlong bearish market.
While staying within an uptight Bollinger band, the price is currently moving below the 50-, 100- and 200-hour SMA. The RSI meanwhile is around 51 – a neutral-bullish zone. However at this time, one must not get too excited as congestion forms. It simply means that support and resistance levels are approaching towards each other in absence of enough trading volume. This could actually translate the prevailing sideways movement to a breakout towards either side.
Watch out for 210 as the main support level. If the price drops below this point, we will be sighting this year’s bottom at around the 165 mark.
The BTC/USD however could extend its current, and small, bull run if it breaks above the 233 resistance level. There, the 210 support will be of less concern and price will smoothly move towards the next resistance around the 248 mark.
Conclusion (On Daily Charts)
Current Mood: Bearish Moving Averages: Sell (2 Buy 10 Sell) Technical Indicators: Strong Sell (2 Buy 7 Sell 2 Neutral)
What's your guess, will the market move north or south?
submitted by Kimba_Coinarch to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/CryptoCurrency] AMA about Tether (USDT)

The following post by SirLamboMoon is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been openly removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ CryptoCurrency/comments/7g6xse
The original post's content was as follows:
Hello, I trade on 6 different exchanges worldwide. I have deeply looked into the Tether situation since it could become a black swan and put a dent into my crypto wealth.
I have examined all the evidence and opinions and have found them to be unsubstantiated at best malicious at worse.
Ask me anything and I will do my best to give you my opinion on what I have found.
 
My only concerns has evolved into... is the idea of Tethers legal (compared to Liberty Reserve or E-gold). After much research on both companies and thinking it over a lot I feel USDT is actually more legit and better suited because of the openness of the blockchain. I know right??
You see they can control the ecosystem (as they did w hack) in a transparent way and they can control the outflows/inflows with stringent KYC/AML (which they have been- far more stories of people not getting approved than not being able to redeem). Their ToS/KYC/AML make it so no launderer would be foolish enough to use them, especially after hack/roll back.
On the other hand, Lib Res/Egold accepted anyone, proudly claimed to be a money substitute and their closed system provided no transparency and plenty of opportunity for nefarious activities.
 
Some key points
  • It makes perfect sense that USDT gets minted/printed when volatility is at its highest (ATH's/crashes). Why would you think that the crypto market will expand/grow but not USDT ( a stablecoin)? USDT is to provide liquidity to traders on exchanges, that is literally all it is used for. And during crashes traders want USDT, so there is a premium you will see of 1-3% on USDT in those cases (an opportunity). Also, there are more inflows than outflows right now because the market is growing more wealth/money wants some exposure.
 
  • I also don't understand why it is easier for people to believe the conjecture over the reality. I think it is because the premise is flawed and the source extremely biased, they think because USDT is inflating (which it should as more fiat enters the system) it is the reason for these gains.
NOT more transactions taking place (across all blockchains), NOT more countries buying that didn't before (KRW/JPY), NOT Coinbase user accounts being created at an extraordinary clip this year, or the google search terms increasing exponentially, or crypto twitters growth. All differing metrics pointing to the same thing... demand. No it's easier to believe the volume is fake, wash trading, and fake tethers... all out in the open (BFX DATA) & open ledgers (USDT)
 
  • All Tether has to do is provide proof of reserves by an independent reputable auditor. The proof they provided from Friedman LLP (top 50 auditor - btw a top 4 auditor won't touch crypto companies until more mature ecosystem) was not enough to stop the FUD. Now they have gone on record twice saying audit is ongoing. Right now there is more evidence pointing to them being solvent than not.
"But they have been saying an audit is forthcoming" They didn't increase the total amount to 100 mill till fairly recent. They are not a money making machine, they make money on money sitting in interest-bearing accts and transaction fees between the fiat world. I can see them not wanting to pay for an expensive reputable audit and thinking showing bank statements would suffice, until it didn't. So now an audit is coming.
 
  • I obviously can not vouch for them 100%, but until USDT becomes unpegged, or there is a premium on Bitfinex (Gox/Cryptsy/Bitinstant all traded at premiums for months due to fiat constraints or no $/crypto), and no audit, I think I will take what the market is saying as the truth.
 
  • The theorists are constantly contradicting themselves. Ex1. TetheFinex has no banking... Friedman provides a memo vouching they checked respective bank accts w $.... oh that could just be a loan. They can't get banking, but a loan for 400 mil, no prob???
Ex2. The amount of tethers to date is enough to horribly crash the markets but not enough to show signs that free money has been pumped into the system. If 100's of millions are pumped into the system it will show divergences (premiums/unpegged) somewhere along the trail.
 
One last thing, what if the worse is true and Tether is not backed, finex is a scam, God doesn't exist, and Trump gets elected a second term (last 2 a joke, obviously)? IMO, it creates a massive buying opportunity. There is nothing wrong with bitcoin/crypto, nothing wrong with its use case, technology or value system. Just an alt currency that only had to have the funds in account. Yes, there will be a short game of hot potato that drives Tether to zero, but that is it. Nothing fundamentally wrong w crypto. Plus I'm not 100% sure the exiting of USDT would not drive crypto higher.
Yes, some exchanges will lose their rep, customers, and traders will lose their stablecoin but perhaps that's the goal, IDK? Who benefits from failed stablecoin? FIAT, banks? One thing is for sure USDT has brought on many more exchanges, IMO is a good thing.
Also, I don't believe Tether to be the ideal way to a stablecoin. But it came along 3 years ago w no better options, has held it's pegged (even now under fire), opened up liquidity past strict/biased/predatory banking infrastructure (who benefits if USDT goes down again?). Maybe that is why they are looking into an ERC20 token that may be verified in real-time, IDK.
 
Good day to you Ladies and Gents..
 
P.S. I post my real trades on twitter @SirLamboMoon - Follow to see if I am worth a damn. I don't share charts and analyze what happenED and be as cryptic as possible about the future. I actually put my entries, targets, and stops. I developed a trading system that has been muy caliente. More info here.. https://www.reddit.com/useSirLamboMoon/comments/7cp2o7/the_system_strategy/
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

How to use Bitfinex to trade bitcoin Trailing stop Bitfinex (BTCUSD@Bitfinex) 3 templates for bitcoin chart ATAS Crypto Bitcoin Short Vs Long Position Bitfinex Chart and how I ... Bitcoin PRICE UPDATE!!  Bitfinex Involved In DRUG TRAFFICKING Via Shell Company

Bitcoin has just given poll & flag channel breakout. Just wait for some correction and RSI breakout. Remember, 12200 is a resistance and when bitcoin price sustain above 12200 a sharp buying expecting. Note: Please exercise extreme care when depositing tokens. In cases where token recovery is needed due to a lack of information provided by you during deposit (e.g., missing or wrong tag, memo or payment id) Bitfinex will charge you a $150.00 fee for the token recovery. Bitcoin (BTCUSD) is now aiming at $9100 or EMA50 on the weekly timeframe... Hit LIKE to get started! Last week we got a higher low and also a candle close below EMA10, signaling a switch from bullish to bearish short-term. With prices now trading below EMA10, Bitcoin is aiming lower. The next support is sitting at $9100/$9250. Marked by EMA50 ... Bitfinex allows traders to buy cryptocurrencies using third-party payment processors OWNR and Mercuryo. Besides the core features, Bitfinex is known for: High Liquidity. Bitfinex is one of the top exchanges in terms of BTC/USD daily trading volume, which guarantees price stability and confidence for every trader. Trading pairs. Bitfinex is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that launched in 2012. The Hong Kong-based company was founded by Raphael Nicolle and is owned and run by iFinex, Inc. Since its introduction, Bitfinex has managed to find its way to the upper echelon of crypto trading exchanges thanks to a suite of advanced trading features, fee structure, asset listing and deep liquidity.

[index] [10913] [27549] [13028] [32440] [10117] [16357] [33904] [4834] [899] [6388]

How to use Bitfinex to trade bitcoin

Free account for charts and technical analysis Tradingview http://bit.ly/trading_view Coinigy Crypto Currency Chart Program 30 Days free with signup http://b... 🔴 Bitcoin & Stocks LIVE : ... Trailing stop Bitfinex - Duration: 11:57. Crecimiento Financiero 12,353 views. 11:57. Best FX Trading Strategies (THE Top Strategy for Forex Trading) ... Using the Trailing Stop Feature in Bitfinex. Use the Conditional Order Feature in Bitrex. "How To" Bitfinex and Tether are very shady, and the story continues. I'll use technical analysis on the Bitcoin price to make a Bitcoin price prediction. Watch the video to learn more! Trailing Stop Loss / Stop Limit / OCO / Fill or Kill Orderarten einfach erklärt - Duration: ... Earn Interest on your Bitcoin - Bitfinex - Duration: 12:28. Joey Zervoulakos 30,266 views.

#